Hello and First Post,

I implicitly trust the opinions of others because I'm a fucking idiot, so I feel comfortable in saying that the Artist Hype, Track Hype and Weekly Top Tracks are great ways to know most people using last.fm are wankers. I haven't even listened to Radiohead's In Rainbows (I tried putting "latest bullshit album" in the tags but it didn't work) but I know it probably sucks because my friends told me it does. Anyway, its component songs have been the Weekly Top Tracks for a while now. Same with the Hype Tracks and so on, with that song from portal being on the list twice over (once for artist Portal and once for Valve). Also Spiderpig that shit wasn't funny at all and you're all a bunch of fuckwits. Fuckin dancing baby and crazy frog all over again. Fuck web 2.0. Let's look at the current top ten: Radiohead, The Beatles, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Muse, Coldplay, Foo Fighters, Linkin Park, Metallica, Nirvana, The Killers. None of these bands don't suck in any particular way. It's indicative of poor taste, and that's why lolcats are so fucking FANTASTIC FUCK. Don't forget the Metallicops bro they're using your data to mount an impressive legal case against you RIGHT NOW.

Here's some useless shit nobody should care to read: mclusky's The Difference Between Me and You Is That I'm Not On Fire is pretty fucking good. Spod's Taste the Radness is similarly awesome. Who cares? Nobody hopefully, but at least this web 2.0 bullshit will make it seem like someone does. I feel so fulfilled. Tags. Meta.

Also I read the last.fm blog and i can't find a web 2.0 to link to it so find it yourself dickhead anyway they mentioned song fingerprinting which sounds great so all you freaks who care that their last.fm is full of artists like Metalica Concer can start complaining about yet another application modifying your id3 tags or whatever your mpcs and flacs have.