SpHaeR wrote:

I wouldn't be so quick to judge the empiricists. There is a lot more to it than just "experience". Locke, Berkeley and Hume all had very good points in criticising the rationalism of Descartes and Spinoza. Skeptics merely reject any certainty, something both empiricists and rationalists claimed to be able to have about some knowledge.

View Profile | Reply

SpHaeR wrote:

Hi, you asked a question a month back in the Skeptic group's shoutbox, and I only read it just now. ("What's the difference between a skeptic and a rationalist?") A rationalist claims that reason is the source of knowledge, and that with reason you can derive truth. A skeptic questions that source - just like the empiricists did, even though a skeptic would also questions the empiricists' source of knowledge (experience).

View Profile | Reply

c4t2007 wrote:

I also had some carrots. Peace.

View Profile | Reply

c4t2007 wrote:

Maybe the mini-Snickers dampened it, but the 35 grams of Psilocyne Equasescens i ate over 3 hours ago on an otherwise empty stomach are only making me happy and relaxed.

View Profile | Reply

datSassl wrote:

wickie forever.

View Profile | Reply

Roland_Ironfist wrote:

wait are you zerozetazignal

View Profile | Reply

Darsa wrote:

Mine is cute because it came outta Galaxy Angel. You know Kokonoe. Nice.

View Profile | Reply

Kokonoe wrote:

Tsukasa is so cute~

View Profile | Reply